top of page
IMG_1105 (1)_edited_edited.jpg

Knowledge of Research

I have seized several opportunities at the University of Prince Edward Island to strengthen my research knowledge. I have written a qualitative research paper on the acculturation of African international students in PEI, and I am currently working as a research assistant and doing a systematic literature review, data analysis, and ethics application on two research projects. This page discusses two other opportunities I got to develop my research knowledge. The page connects to two artifacts demonstrating my growth in research, (iii) a mixed methodological approach to investigating formative assessment in online education and (iv) digital literacy skills for FE teachers: A book review published by the Canadian Journal of Education.

Introduction to artifact three

A mixed methodological approach to investigating formative assessment in online education

Artifact three, a mixed methodological approach to investigating formative assessment in online education, is a revised paper I originally submitted as a methodology paper for my Directed Studies in Educational Research Methodology and Methods course (ED 7020). The artifact broadly discusses the mixed-methodology design and focuses on the exploratory sequential design. This section explains how I improved the original paper and provides evidence to support my choice of a mixed-methods design. 

 

The artifact reflects my competency to conduct advanced mixed-methodology research. The artifact is in two parts. The first part is a discussion of the philosophical underpinning of mixed methodology. It explains critical realism and explores ontological and epistemological tension inherent in mixing methodologies. It discusses research problems requiring mixed-methodology and ends with an explanation of the exploratory sequential design. The second half of the paper talks about the methods I will use in my proposed dissertation. It explores sampling and sampling techniques, the instrument for data collection, the validity and reliability of instruments, and concludes with an exposition on data analysis strategies. I strengthened the original paper by considering my supervising committee members' feedback to review arguments and build on the literature. I have also rephrased paragraphs and restructured sentences to improve reading and understanding.

​

This section discussed artifact three, a mixed methodological approach to investigating formative assessment in online education. Mixed methods adopt broad critical examination to gather quality, diverse, and comprehensive data. It adopts multiple methods from qualitative and quantitative methodologies to answer research questions. In Artifact one, I argued that critical realism distinguishes between the empirical - "what can be observed," the actual - "what is known but cannot always be seen," and the real - "hidden but necessary precondition for the actual and empirical" (Walsh & Evans, 2014, p. 2). The information I would gather through interviews and surveys could be incomplete and represent only the empirical or the actual worlds. Thus, it may not be a comprehensive representation of online formative assessment. Therefore, I will conduct document analysis on previous assessment records to unearth other information I may not get during interview and survey processes. The theoretical framework of the study will guide this process. I will probe how instructors communicate success criteria, collect, and interpret information about students' learning, provide feedback, and conform their teaching to students' needs.

Introduction to artifact four

Digital literacy skills for FE teachers: A book review published by the Canadian Journal of Education.

The fourth artifact demonstrates my development in the knowledge of research. I published a review on Jonathan White's book on Digital literacy for FE teachers. FE or Further Education is designed to prepare students academically and for work. Students are trained to demonstrate competencies across subjects, including arts and design, sciences, business, computing, and digital technologies. The FE program also covers vocational training apprenticeships and exposes students to current trends and skills required in their chosen professions. Students graduate from the program with a General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) and Advanced Levels (A-levels). Jonathan White's ten chapters book aims to help FE teachers. It provides resources for training, assessing, coaching, facilitating, and supporting students to build their competencies in digital environments.

 

In my review, I examined White's treatment of digital literacy and his focus on teaching in digital environments. I argued in favour of his discussions on (a) understanding digital needs and advancing digital practice; (b) being critical with digital tools, information, and media; (c) management of digital identity and responsible use of technologies; (d) copyright licensing and ethical use of digital information and media. Moreover, I commented on his expositions on teaching in digital environments. Though, I lauded his position on the pros and cons of didactic, constructivist and connectivists pedagogical approaches in online learning. I argued that he could strengthen his discussions with more research evidence.

​

The book was a really good read as I picked up new ideas for my dissertation and teaching. From the author's discussion on teaching in digital environments, I broadened my understanding of how to help learners be more engaged in class, control their learning, develop their creativity, and make more efficient and productive use of their online time. Further, I identified pitfalls in online teaching and assessment through the author's discussions on understanding digital needs and advancing digital practice. I, therefore, modified my proposed dissertation's interview protocol to account for the effects of digital approaches on learners and learning outcomes and how teachers can avoid assumptions on students' technological aptitudes, which could lead to their exclusion from the digital age.

​

This page reflected on artifact four, a published review I wrote on Jonathan White's book on Digital literacy for FE teachers. In summary, Jonathan's book puts me in a good position to begin the proposal for my dissertation. I am reviewing Greenstein's (2014) book on assessing 21st-century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning for publication. After reading and reviewing the book, I am optimistic that I will develop more insight into teaching and assessing 21st-century skills, which is the area of my research.

​

​

​

Comprehensive e-Portfolio, ED 7050

Ph.D. Student, UPEI

Supervisor: Dr. Ronald MacDonald 

Committee member: Dr. Kathy Snow

bottom of page